Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Home Blog Page 7

History Made at the Grand Slam

0

Emma Raducanu made history as she was crowned the 2021 US Open champion to become the first British woman to clinch a Grand Slam singles title for 44 years.

The 18-year-old completed a truly remarkable sporting triumph as she overcame fellow teenager Leylah Fernandez of Canada, 6-4 6-3, in a very memorable showpiece final at Flushing Meadows. Raducanu, the first qualifier in the Open era to reach a Grand Slam final, was not remotely fazed by the big occasion and held her composure, despite late drama, to make history in becoming the first British woman to win the US Open singles title for 53 years.

The irrepressible Brit got off to a stunning start as she broke serve at the first opportunity in the second game after a pulsating extended deuce in front of a raucous crowd inside Arthur Ashe. But the unseeded Fernandez was equally impressive as she responded in electrifying fashion to break straight back and level up with a dazzling array of groundstrokes. The first all-teenage final since Serena Williams v Martina Hingis in 1999 could not have been a higher standard right from the outset as the pair fearlessly traded blows from the back of the court. The opening set was on a knife-edge throughout but a flashing forehand winner from Raducanu created the breakthrough as she ruthlessly capitalised on her fourth set point on the Fernandez serve.

Having seized her moment to strike and take the opener, Raducanu was immediately put under immense pressure in the second set as Fernandez returned from a sideline break with a typically doughty resolve. The Canadian world number 73 brushed aside a series of leading players en route – taking out defending champion Naomi Osaka, fifth seed Elina Svitolina, world number two Aryna Sabalenka and three-time Grand Slam champion Angelique Kerber – and she responded admirably with a gutsy break at the start of the second set.

Raducanu did not drop a single set throughout the tournament, going right back to the qualifiers, and she hit straight back with a sublime backhand winner closing out an immediate break back to ensure Fernandez could not level up the match.
The best was yet to come: sections of Arthur Ashe Stadium gave the Brit a standing ovation as she zipped to her right and unleashed an outrageous forehand winner to break once again and seize the ascendancy to lead 4-2 with Fernandez in disbelief.
With the composure and poise for which she is now renowned, Raducanu proceeded to nervelessly close out one of the most incredible Grand Slam triumphs in memory to make history on the biggest stage in the sport, despite late drama when she slipped and required medical attention in the final game.

“First of all, I really want to congratulate Leylah and her team, she played some incredible tennis and has beaten some of the top players in the world,” Raducanu said in her victory speech. “The level was extremely high and I hope we play each other in many more tournaments and hopefully finals. As for this three weeks in New York, I would say having such a supportive team, the LTA, my agent, and everyone back home watching on TV, thank you so much for your support over the years. “Thank you for making me feel so at home from my first qualifying match, you have spurred me on in some difficult moments and I hope me and Leylah put on a good match today. Leylah is always going to play great tennis and fight, that is why she is in the final, I knew I would have to dig deep. “I fell somehow and thought that would throw me off balance – I was praying not for a double fault! We got through it and focused on the process and mindset, that really helped in those tough times.

“It shows the future of women’s tennis and depth of the game is so great, every player in the draw has a shot at winning any tournament, I hope the next generation can follow in the steps of some of the legends, for example Billie Jean right here. It means so much to have Virginia Wade here and also Tim Henman, British icons and for me to follow in their footsteps… it gave me the belief I could do it.”
Fernandez said: “It is incredible. I have no idea what to say. Today is going to be hard but Emma played amazing. Congratulations. I am very proud of myself and having the New York crowd has been amazing. Thank you so much New York. Thank you everyone.

“I know on this day it was especially hard for New York and everyone around the US. I hope I can be as strong and resilient as New York has been the last 20 years. I love you New York and hope to see you next year.” It is surely only the start for the British teenager in what is already a distinguished career as she celebrated a quite astonishing journey from qualifier to Grand Slam champion.

Looking young and career

Looking like a teenager who has accidentally wandered into the office can make or break your career. Should we want to look youthful – or does it come with a cost?


It was 4 April 1911: William F Murray’s first day at work. He had been sworn in to the 62nd United States Congress, and was ready to embark on an illustrious career in politics. There was just one problem. Murray was 29 years old, making him the youngest representative at the time. He had been endowed with unusually boyish features, and styled his hair with a neat side parting – kind of like he was posing for a school photo. Next to his greying, pot-bellied colleagues, it would be fair to say that he didn’t really look the part. That same day, the chairman barked an order at him to fetch a book, after mistaking him for one of their House Pages – a role usually fulfilled by secondary-school students. “All right, Bill,” said Murray, “but the next time kindly address me as ‘the member from Massachusetts’.” In almost every other area of life, looking young is highly coveted – by 2022, the anti-ageing industry is projected to be worth an estimated $260bn (£188bn), with some individuals now spending more on rejuvenating skincare each month than their mortgage.
But in the office, it’s a different story. There isn’t currently any data on exactly how many people are negatively affected by their youthful appearance each year – but the internet is awash with harrowing anecdotes about embarrassments and misunderstandings. There’s the teacher who was loudly accused of being in the staff room without permission, and even asked for ID; the brewery worker mistaken for a “little girl” by a customer; and the many, many doctors assailed on a daily basis by alarmed patients observing “you look so young!”. In fact, there’s mounting evidence that appearing younger than your age isn’t just inconvenient – it can have a radical impact on the way your competence is viewed, and even determine the kind of job you do in the first place. From nudging younger-looking people into more caring roles to not-so-subtly policing whether you’re considered suitable for public office, studies suggest that this invisible factor can make or break careers.

Too cute?
There are several underlying reasons people might feel that they’re judged to be younger than their years: you might be petite or have a short stature, or style yourself in fashionable clothes, for example. But the best-studied route is having a baby face. The “babyface overgeneralisation effect” was first discovered in the 1980s, and occurs when possessing babyish facial features leads people to assume that you have corresponding personality traits. “[The babyface] is really an overall constellation of features,” says Leslie Zebrowitz, Professor Emerita of Social Relations at Brandeis University, US, who co-discovered the phenomenon. She explains that this usually includes a flat, round face, small jaw, button nose and wide doe-eyes, while more mature-looking individuals generally have smaller eyes, more angular cheekbones, larger noses and stronger brow-ridges. It’s well-established that people with baby faces look young because they literally remind people of babies. Oddly, the effect applies no matter how old you actually are – or whether you have the plump, airbrushed skin of a model in a moisturiser advert or the slightly more weather-beaten visage of a lifelong sunworshipper. The facial structure of baby-faced people means they usually look young relative to others in the same age group, meaning that the associations this appearance comes with can still have an impact well into middle age and later life.


Baby-faced people are seen as having less “personal control” than others in young and middle adulthood, along with people who are considered unattractive or overweight. There are some upsides to reminding people of a cute baby – the babyface effect is thought to elicit the same protective behaviors that help us shelter these vulnerable members of society, so you’re automatically assumed to be warm, trustworthy and kind. As you’d expect, babyfaces are ubiquitous in children’s cartoons, characters in adverts, sports mascots and cuddly dog breeds – particularly pugs.

Baby-faced people are also more likely to be found in certain jobs. In one study, they were more likely to be considered for a teaching position at a day-care centre that explicitly required candidates to be warm and submissive. The tie into success. Baby-faced people have easier lives in many ways: they’re widely thought of as more attractive, even in demographics as distinct as Aché hunter-gatherers from Paraguay and university students from Russia. But they’re also expected to be lacking in certain traits that can be essential for career progression, or working in some professions entirely. For example, the same research that identified the bias in favour of baby-faced applicants for teaching positions also found that mature-looking people were generally preferred for the position of director, which called for dominance and the ability to make harsh decisions. Perhaps as a result, people who look young for their age tend to have lower-status jobs instead which lack this kind of authority. This might be because baby-faced people are seen as having less “personal control” – defined as competence, mastery or the ability to enact their goals – than others in young and middle adulthood, along with people who are considered unattractive or overweight.


Not only are people who look older more likely to be considered for high-status managerial roles, they’re also deemed to be more suitable for jobs requiring a higher level of educational attainment. “So, mature-faced people have similar outcomes in the job market to high achievers,” says Zebrowitz. In one study, men deemed to have a baby face were most likely to have jobs as childcare workers, elementary school teachers, teacher aides and members of the clergy, and least likely to be judges, truck drivers, policemen and foremen. For women, the most common careers were similar; elementary school teachers, kindergarten teachers, teaching aides and nursing aides, while those who were more mature-looking tended to hold jobs as computer systems analysts, law teachers, athletes and foremen. The effect is found among politicians as well as the leaders of Fortune 500 companies; the latter generally have more dominant facial features than the general population or people in other high-status jobs, such as professors. This appears to be based on pure perception, because companies with CEOs that look the part are not more likely to do better than others.


However, there are exceptions. Surprisingly, black men heading companies at the same level are more likely to have baby-faced features. One idea is that this is down to implicit racism, which means that black men are generally seen as threatening, so having a baby face is an advantage because it softens these impressions. Men deemed to have a baby face were most likely to have jobs as childcare workers, elementary school teachers, teacher aides and members of the clergy. Other research has established that, consistent with the stereotype of baby-faced people being warm and trustworthy, the CEOs of non-profit charities are more likely to have this type of face. On average, the ones with more powerful-looking CEOs raise less money.


In the real world, the contrasting treatment of young-looking workers often ties in with how people are treated based on their actual age. Younger workers might be criticised more than older ones, belittled using derogatory language – such as describing them as a “young whippersnapper” – paid less than older colleagues for the same role, overlooked for promotion or unfairly dismissed. In fact, while Western society has a well-documented culture of fetishising youth and marginalising the elderly, ageism against younger workers is increasingly being recognised. The 2019 Diversity & Inclusion Study by the job-search website Glassdoor found that, in the UK, 18-to-34 year olds are almost twice as likely to report being discriminated against based on their age than older groups.

Reframing our thinking

In the UK, there are some legal protections against age-related bias, regardless of whether it’s based on your actual age or the perception of it – known as “discrimination by perception”. Meanwhile in the US, there is currently no specific law to prevent prejudice on the basis of facial appearance, though there has been some debate about how this could be implemented. As early as 1987, a Harvard Law Review article proposed that the existing legislation should be modified to prevent discrimination due to “the largely immutable aspects of bodily and facial appearance”.
As with other forms of bias, it’s possible that people from certain racial backgrounds may be more at risk. It’s been suggested that part of the reason Asian people stereotypically look young for their age might be because baby-faced traits are more common in this group. However, there are a couple of things young-looking people can do to adjust the way they’re seen in the workplace. The most obvious option is to change your appearance. Research has shown that 20-something women look older when they wear makeup – though surprisingly, this is not true for older age groups – and adding makeup, trousers and jewellery can boost how competent a woman seems as a leader. On the other hand, people view men with beards as older and higher status than those who are clean-shaven. They’re also generally seen as more capable.


The question is, do you want to alter how you look, to overcome the irrational biases of other people? As it happens, there is an alternative. Nicola Simpson, an executive career coach based in London, says she regularly encounters this issue – but she’s not always convinced that how her clients look is actually the underlying issue. “This comes up quite often when clients come to a coaching session lacking in confidence and feeling a sense of imposter syndrome,” she says. In Simpson’s experience, people can struggle with perceptions of how young they look in any profession, though it’s slightly more common among management consultants and people in leadership roles. “Maybe they’re at a point in their career where they want to convey leadership and gravitas, and they feel that they look young for their years – and that this is being held against them,” says Simpson, “but equally they’re often feeling ‘maybe I am too young to be in a managerial position’.”


To overcome this, Simpson tries to help her clients with what is within their control. Rather than dwelling on how the outside world views them, she tends to focus on helping them to understand where their anxieties are coming from. “Our conversations are more about what they could do to feel more confident – bringing in tools to reframe their thinking into something that’s much more positive and supportive.” Simpson suggests trying to be aware of when you’ve been triggered by fears about how you’re perceived, and consciously shifting your thoughts to a more positive outlook. If you project confidence, you’ll automatically seem more competent – regardless of what biases are really at work in the minds of your colleagues.

Source : BBC News

Influencing Personality Types

Every mother knows that when she looks at her child in the nursery for the very first time, something in his personality is already on display: whether he’s active or quiet, shy or introverted, extraverted or anxious, passive or aggressive. You can observe these characteristics right away. And, as you get to know your child better, you recognize that you can frame his environment to form his personality.

For example: you may have a shy child, and you recognize that right from the start by his reactions around strangers. Now, by creating social situations in which you build your child’s confidence around others, your shy child learns to trust you, his environment, and other people through monitored exposure. Will your child ever be a gregarious social butterfly? Probably not. But, can you help him become more socially confident? Yes.

Influencing your personality type

There’s a window in which you can influence a personality type. Extraverts, for example, put out less energy when they are with others, and therefore, are replenished by social discourse. An introvert, on the other hand, uses up a lot of energy to socially interact, and as a result, can find too much social exposure both draining and exhausting. In fact, neuroscience tells us that there is a biological origin to the five core personality types. Thus, there is no perfect personality type. And, there are no clear delineations of personality, but rather, many personality trees in our forest.

Because you are always evolving, and fluid in your emotions, you have the opportunity to deliberately and consciously develop or strengthen some traits that you like, and lower the decibels of those you don’t. By becoming aware of your own personality patterns, you can stop projecting out onto others your feelings unconsciously. This is how you gain control over your behavior, rather than being compelled by your complexes.

By catching a glimpse of the principles under your personality patterns, you can positively affect them in a way that works for you; this is how you can influence your personality type. So, although you cannot change the consolation of your complete personality, you can influence those parts of yourself — those multiple trees in your forest — to be more of what you want to be. This allows you to be comfortable in your own skin, and gives you the ability to choose the appropriate part of yourself in different social and emotional experiences. Thus, rather than being reactive, you can choose which traits to strengthen and which traits to use, which traits to enhance and which traits to reduce.

In the final analysis, your personality traits are inborn and yet, your environment can shape your personality traits, even if they go against type. So when picking a job, a career, or a mate, it is important to recognize who you are, the real you, so that you can discriminate between your wants and your needs, and strengthen and coalesce the dominant traits that work the best.

Royal Ascot opens. Summer is here.

The well-known event started on Tuesday 15th June, and attracted droves of celebrities, royalty as well as well-dressed men, women and children who are all wanting in on the fun and the opportunity to catch the eye of some the world’s most influential. A pillar of British sporting life, the Royal Ascot is as much about high fashion and celebrity culture as it is about high stakes on the tracks. The event first took place in 1839, and has run almost continually ever since – though it’s not the only significant racing occasion at the spectacular Ascot Racecourse. The event is the most valuable race meeting in Britain with a total prize fund of £6million.

While the Queen opted to watch the opening day from the comfort of her Castle, other Royals, Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall were there, alongside the Princess Royal, the Earl and Countess of Wessex and Zara and Mike Tindall. It is expected that there will be more royal appearances throughout the week. Other celebrities and famous people were also spotted in their best outfits. One that caught the eye is Charlotte Hawkins, GMB morning and Classic FM Sunday night’s presenter, in her white and yellow midi dress oozing style and elegance

As for betting enthusiasts, the favourites can change over time, with some horses performing well in races leading up to Royal Ascot coming to the fore, while others fall away. There might be issues with injuries or trainers that could also impact the horses that will be lining up at the starting line come race day. Some of this year’s favourites are : Stradivarius, Battaash, Palace Pier, Just Fine, Pied Piper, Campanelle and Spring is Sprung.

It was a scorching day at Ascot Racecourse attended by 12,000 people allowed as part of the Government’s pilot test event programme where everyone is tested before and after and no masks or distancing for spectators. The Champagne and Pimms flowed as racing got underway on the first day of the Royal meeting. King George VI is also a prestigious weekend meeting, second only to the Royal Meeting, and involves its own unique spectacle in the form of a royal procession to kick off the action on the tracks.

Whether you’re a seasoned better or once-a-year type spectator, the onset of summer and start of the horse racing season always brings with it a sense of excitement and carefree fun.

US Women’s Open’s final

The United States Women’s Open is at its mid-point with the final 36 holes being contested this weekend at the Olympic Club’s Lake Course in San Francisco. A field of 156 of the top female professional and amateur golfers is vying for the most prestigious trophy in the history of women’s golf. This year’s event will mark the 12th time that a golf course of note has hosted both a men’s and a women’s National Open. This is the 76th edition of the oldest of the five majors that make up the LPGA Tour.

What was then called the “Ladies Open” was initially contested in 1946. It was organized by an entity called the Women’s PGA. The champion of that very first women’s golf major was future Hall of Famer Patty Berg. The Women’s PGA suffered from financial issues from the very beginning and went belly-up at the end of 1949.

In 1950 the Ladies Professional Golf Association was founded by 13 established women professionals of note and included Louise Suggs, the aforementioned Patty Berg who also served as the LPGA’s first president, Marlene Hagge, and the best known female golfer of the post-war era, Babe Zaharias. The brand new LPGA circuit continued with the playing of the Ladies Open. In 1953 the United States Golf Association agreed to become the full time host of the Open and the name of the tournament was changed to the United States Women’s Open. It followed the same criteria as the men’s U.S. Open with a certain amount of top golfers receiving exemptions into the tournament coupled with the remainder of the field advancing to the championship by means of regional qualifying tournaments.

For a period of time, the U.S. Women’s Open was played in minor markets at golf courses that weren’t necessarily among golf’s top courses. Some of those early Opens were contested at courses such as Starmount Country Club in Greensboro, Rolling Hills Country Club in Wichita, and the Dunes Golf and Beach Club in Myrtle Beach. On two occasions the Women’s Open was played at Winged Foot and Baltusrol although it was held at the “other” courses that make up those 36 hole complexes. In other words, it wasn’t held on the same courses that hosted the men’s version of the National Open. However, beginning in 1977 with the playing of the Women’s Open at Hazeltine, the ladies started playing their Open on courses that had also served as sites for the men. Over the course of the last 30 years or so, the women have been to

Colonial, Oakmont, Interlachen, Cherry Hills, Pinehurst, and most recently, the Champion Golf Club in Houston last December. In a similar vein, the 2023 version of the Women’s Open will be held at Pebble Beach Golf Links.

Scheduling this year’s U.S. Women’s Open at the storied Olympic Club is a real feather in the cap of the women’s game. First opened in 1924 and designed by the well known team of Willie Watson and Sam Whiting, the Olympic Club is situated alongside the southwest corner of San Francisco alongside the banks of Lake Merced. Its golfing neighbors include Harding Park, the site of last year’s PGA Championship, the highly regarded San Francisco Golf Club, and Lake Merced Country Club, the site of next week’s LPGA MEDIHEAL Championship.

Of course from the men’s perspective, the Olympic Club has been known for its heart-breaking moments for some of the game’s top performers. It all started at the 1955 Open when virtual unknown Jack Fleck defeated Ben Hogan in an 18 hole playoff. Arnold Palmer lost a big lead in the 1966 U.S. Open and faltered the following day to Billy Casper in a Monday 18 hole playoff. Scott Simpson eclipsed Tom Watson at the end in 1987 while the same happened to the ever popular Payne Stewart in 1998 at the hands of Lee Janzen. Webb Simpson won the U.S. Open title at Olympic in 2012 when Jim Furyk struggled down the stretch. The Olympic Club has also hosted a pair of U.S. Amateurs, the 1981 version won by Nathaniel Crosby, the son of longtime O Club member Bing Crosby, and the 2007 Amateur captured by Colt Knost.

There are multiple story lines at this year’s U.S. Women’s Open. San Francisco resident and former Stanford University student Michelle Wie West is making her golf comeback from wrist surgery in 2019. She is now married, has a young daughter, and the ever popular 2014 U.S. Open champ is hoping for a golfing comeback. So too is Inbee Park, winner of seven LPGA majors although her last one was at the 2015 Women’s British Open. A win by Inbee would be her third U.S. Open title. It’s hard to think about 24 year old Lydia Ko and comebacks, but she has been in a Jordan Spieth type slump over the past three years. She went winless on the LPGA Tour from May 2018 to this past April when she finally broke through and won her 16th circuit title. Ko has been on golf’s center stage since she won the Canadian Women’s Open in 2012 as a 15 year old amateur, and the game is in a much better place when the affable Lydia Ko is atop the LPGA leader boards.

There are two sets of sisters at the Olympic Club this year, and all four of them are capable of winning the U.S. Women’s Open. Nelly Korda and Jessica Korda won back to back LPGA tournaments earlier this year. Neither has a major title to her name, but both are among the favorites this week. So too are Ariya and Mariya Jutanugarn of Thailand. Ariya won the LPGA tourney in Thailand last month and a win at the Olympic Club would be her third grand slam title to go along with the 2016 British Open and the 2018 U.S. Open.

When all is said and done, it will take a control player who is an iron master to prevail this Sunday evening at the U.S. Women’s Open at the Olympic Club. The course will play to a par of 71 and can be stretched out to 6,457 yards. The Lake Course at the Olympic Club has a number of dogleg holes and most of them are built along the hilly slopes that run in that direction. A dogleg right hole drifts to the right meaning that a tee shot down the left side will end up in the middle of the fairway. Trying to cut the dogleg could be a bit precarious as the tee shot could instead bound further right into the wiry rough.

The 76th version of the United States Women’s Open is playing out this weekend at the Olympic Club’s Lake Course alongside San Francisco’s Lake Merced. It should be a great weekend of women’s grand slam golf. However, if the history of the O Club has anything to offer us, we might need to assume that the favorites will be upset by someone from the pack.

Source : Record-bee

All The Best Memorial Day Beauty Sales to Shop This Weekend

Stock up on products from brands like La Mer, MAC, Sand & Sky, and more — at discounts up to 70 percent off.
All The Best Memorial Day Beauty Sales to Shop This Weekend

Review: Signature Club A's Nature’s Color Lift Capsules

0

Review: Signature Club A’s Nature’s Color Lift Capsules
Beauty News
{$excerpt:n}
Capsules that claim to provide firmer, lifted skin
Review: Signature Club A’s Nature’s Color Lift Capsules

A history of piercing

0

A history of piercing
Beauty News
{$excerpt:n}
Face and body piercing have a longer history than you’d think!
A history of piercing